Archive for category Airlines

CAPTAIN’S INAPPROPRIATE ACTIONS LED TO CRASH OF FLIGHT 3407

de Havilland Dash 8

The National Transportation Safety Board determined that the

captain of Colgan Air flight 3407 inappropriately responded

to the activation of the stick shaker, which led to an

aerodynamic stall from which the airplane did not recover.

In a report adopted today in a public Board meeting in

Washington, additional flight crew failures were noted as

causal to the accident.

On February 12, 2009, a Colgan Air, Inc., Bombardier DHC-8-

400, N200WQ, operating as Continental Connection flight

3407, was on an instrument approach to Buffalo-Niagara

International Airport, Buffalo, New York, when it crashed

into a residence in Clarence Center, New York, about 5

nautical miles northeast of the airport. The 2 pilots, 2

flight attendants, and 45 passengers aboard the airplane

were killed, one person on the ground was killed, and the

airplane was destroyed by impact forces and a postcrash

fire. The flight was a 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

Part 121 scheduled passenger flight from Newark, New Jersey.

Night visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the

time of the accident.

The report states that, when the stick shaker activated to

warn the flight crew of an impending aerodynamic stall, the

captain should have responded correctly to the situation by

pushing forward on the control column.   However, the

captain inappropriately pulled aft on the control column and

placed the airplane into an accelerated aerodynamic stall.

Contributing to the cause of the accident were the

Crewmembers’ failure to recognize the position of the

low-speed cue on their flight displays, which indicated that

the stick shaker was about to activate, and their failure to

adhere to sterile cockpit procedures.  Other contributing

factors were the captain’s failure to effectively manage the

flight and Colgan Air’s inadequate procedures for airspeed

selection and management during approaches in icing

conditions.

As a result of this accident investigation, the Safety Board

issued recommendations to the Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA) regarding strategies to prevent flight

crew monitoring failures, pilot professionalism, fatigue,

remedial training, pilot records, stall training, and

airspeed selection procedures.  Additional recommendations

address FAA’s oversight and use of safety alerts for

operators to transmit safety-critical information, flight

operational quality assurance (FOQA) programs, use of

personal portable electronic devices on the flight deck, and

weather information provided to pilots.

At today’s meeting, the Board announced that two issues that

had been encountered in the Colgan Air investigation would

be studied at greater length in proceedings later this year.

The Board will hold a public forum this Spring exploring

pilot and air traffic control high standards.   This

accident was one in a series of incidents investigated by

the Board in recent years – including a mid-air collision

over the Hudson River that raised questions of air traffic

control vigilance, and the Northwest Airlines incident last

year where the airliner overflew its destination airport in

Minneapolis because the pilots were distracted by non-flying

activities – that have involved air transportation

professionals deviating from expected levels of performance.

In addition, this Fall the Board will hold a public forum

on code sharing, the practice of airlines marketing their

services to the public while using other companies to

actually perform the transportation.  For example, this

accident occurred on a Continental Connection flight,

although the transportation was provided by Colgan Air.

A summary of the findings of the Board’s report are

available on the NTSB’s website at:

http://www.ntsb.gov/Publictn/2010/AAR1001.htm

NTSB Media Contact:     Keith Holloway

hollow@ntsb.gov

(202) 314-6100

Technorati Tags:

Tags:

Senate panel increases pressure on FAA’s fatigue solution

Randy Babbitt FAA

Randy Babbitt FAA

WASHINGTON, D.C.–In a letter to FAA Administrator Randolph (Randy) Babbitt, Chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV (D-WV), Ranking Member Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), Chairman of the Aviation Operations, Safety and Security Subcommittee Byron Dorgan (D-ND), and Ranking Member of the Aviation Operations, Safety and Security Subcommittee Jim DeMint (R-SC) joined together along with Senators Snowe, Kerry, Klobuchar, Lautenberg, Thune, Begich, and Johanns and wrote that the issue of pilot fatigue must be addressed.
Today, FAA Administrator Babbitt testified before the Aviation Operations, Safety and Security Subcommittee today at a hearing on Aviation Safety: Oversight of FAA Safety Initiatives.
The letter sent reads:
Dear Administrator Babbitt,
Aviation safety is the top priority for the Aviation Subcommittee, and we know this view is shared by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).  We look forward to your upcoming testimony at our hearing on FAA’s safety initiatives.
One of the topics we plan to address at the hearing is pilot fatigue.  The subcommittee recently held a hearing to examine this issue, which has been on the National Transportation Safety Board’s (NTSB) Most Wanted List for 19 years.  The current FAA guidelines on flight time and duty limitations were set back in the 1940s.  It is critical that the FAA revise these rules as quickly as possible.

Although we appreciate the commitment you made in August to update these regulations, it was troubling to learn from the FAA at the hearing last week that the time frame for completing this process has already been delayed.  We expect the FAA to consider this issue a priority and to keep on a timeline that will update the regulations without more delay.

We look forward to discussing this and other important safety concerns at the hearing.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Tags: , , , ,

No more “free pass” with FAA’s new DUI policy

FAA

FAA

The FAA has issued new rules concerning its DUI policy. In the past, an airman seeking medical certification was required to present the AME with the court documents concerning the DUI (driving under the influence, or driving while intoxicated) and the doctor had the authority to issue the medical if the AME determined that the airman did not have a substance abuse problem.

Now, as explained in the FAA’s Medical Bulletin, the AME must defer all medical certifications in which the applicant’s BAC (blood alcohol level) is greater than or equal to 0.15% or a positive result for DUI.  The FAA will then mandates that the airman undergo a substance abuse evaluation before any medical certification will be issued.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Tags: , ,

FAA withdraws flightcrew duty, rest NPRM

The FAA issued a withdrawal of its 1995 Notice of Published Rulemaking (NPRM) on establishing rest, duty and flight time limitation of flight crewmembers.  In that document, the FAA stated the NPRM had become outdated and because it raised so many issues that the FAA needed to address it decided to that new proposal will follow.

Long before and in the 14 years since, the rest, duty and flighttime requirements have been studied continually and proposal after proposal have been put out there and nothing has come from it.  The February crash of Colgan 3407 in Buffalo, NY was just the last of the so-called “clarion call” regarding what to do about tired pilots.  It is simply unbelievable that a NPRM has languished for nearly a decade and a half without any final rule on duty and rest.

Technorati Tags: ,

Tags: ,

FAA’s Babbitt singles out pitot covers as room for improvement

In a speech given to the Regional Airline Association November 10th, FAA administrator Randy Babbitt spoke about the culture of professionalism, need for mentoring junior pilots and safety.  Curiously, he also specifically mentioned Safety Enhancement 175.

Randy Babbitt FAA

Randy Babbitt FAA

Babbitt quotes during the speech,   “To prevent loss of pitot static system flight data, airlines/maintenance should provide visible tagging any time the pitot static system … pitot tubes and static ports … are covered during maintenance or servicing, for example, washing. In addition, preflight walk-around procedures should include specific verification that pitot static ports are uncovered.”

It seems to me a curious statement to be bringing this up in a speech about safety in light of all of the other accidents and incidents that have occurred recently.  As far as I know, the only related occurrence to this would be Air France flight 447,  an Airbus A-330, which was lost on June 1st.  Investigators have been looking into the pitot/static system as a cause of the accident.  The investigation is not, I presume, focusing on whether the First Officer neglected to remove the pitot covers prior to departure.

A search of the NTSB accident/accident database in the last 10 years resulted in no findings of pitot/static related causes due to covers left on.

Technorati Tags: ,

Tags: ,